Hi,

In short, I suspect you'll OOM if you sort and facet on all these fields.

Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/





On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:56 AM, kobe.free.wo...@gmail.com <
kobe.free.wo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> Scenario:
>
> My data model consist of approx. 450 fields with different types of data.
> We
> want to include each field for indexing as a result it will create a single
> SOLR document with *450 fields*. The total of number of records in the data
> set is *755K*. We will be using the features like faceting and sorting on
> approx. 50 fields.
>
> We are planning to use SOLR 4.1. Following is the hardware configuration of
> the web server that we plan to install SOLR on:-
>
> CPU: 2 x Dual Core (4 cores) | RAM: 12GB | Storage: 212 GB
>
> Questions :
>
> 1)What's the best approach when dealing with documents with large number of
> fields. What's the drawback of having a single document with a very large
> number of fields. Does SOLR support documents with large number of fields
> as
> in my case?
>
> 2)Will there be any performance issue if i define all of the 450 fields for
> indexing? Also if faceting is done on 50 fields with document having large
> number of fields and huge number of records?
>
> 3)The name of the fields in the data set are quiet lengthy around 60
> characters. Will it be a problem defining fields with such a huge name in
> the schema file? Is there any best practice to be followed related to
> naming
> convention? Will big field names create problem during querying?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Documents-with-large-number-of-fields-450-tp4049633.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Reply via email to