-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 19.03.2013 02:49, schrieb Koji Sekiguchi: >> So just to be clear: There is no possibility to highlight >> results, if I use variable gram size. Neither the original >> highlighter nor FVH do the job. Or am I missing something? > > I don't know the latest original highlighter has such restriction > or not today, Just in case somebody is interested: Solr 4.2 can't highlight results reliably using variable gram size. Neither using original Highlighter nor using FastVectorHighlighter. > but when FVH came in 2.9, at that time, the original highlighter > couldn't deal with n-gram field if n > 1, because (k)-th term's end > offset can be larger than (k+1)-th term's start offset. > >> Btw does any documentation exits how the VFH works? > > See package summary: > > http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_2_0/highlighter/org/apache/lucene/search/vectorhighlight/package-summary.html > > > > koji
- -- Jochen Just Fon: (++49) 711/28 07 57-193 avono AG Mobil: (++49) 172/73 85 387 Breite Straße 2 Mail: jochen.j...@avono.de 70173 Stuttgart WWW: http://www.avono.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRSrwLAAoJEP1xbhgWUHmSDwEQALGZ+5boTSllItUCG0qaDMA0 5CXNBWzvf+DVV589rOIhIU8OtaNgIrNqLCBT/3hUZvUIcCQV9Y61oBXWSQ5E4oXZ qC0p2mflNIAOcPutM21kQT+V+XWu1lG06IEIZzSNJqv75d+j6NZE0HdHMNSfdcTl 5pRPDCyrflAwR8Ryj9HjmOTLzW1lPqqfVGaRbY9WvGZE5G3USn8QRpgbODH4Hnb4 IgIdDa8C+ihW55KbzXB60xGG5F1/CFByXfBdLhsH2FDgE8p08noS5LKUH9czDO4y PGjz2Nx8qcBq0iyj9yzibR4OOa+vvbgWQup9t8cJIbmjIDNWXXYUQdMk+XyB0cxU ZdplyZA1KRA5D4hrYyrVYNDBgkAAcDTsdYT1MTIgnR2jVD29BU9RENAeR4DKYvp1 9l93+h0sCsfyudl+GBIr/aWvpW3SfK5DS3hDiXNr+js1V9m2jBDzGzD4AW/chLGU uaU3UCjRWVhWmYbk/sEyxWYW0SHxDaxDRlvzDRXDvmHXR6nwphCDFPmtmY5lBAHY e4gI3Iim7nu37Muu2tPqHzd8SuBWpwO1jMGJRk2qtBwVN2su/PmxExpc3mqypQ+q UzMxu95Me4hzDBXR+Vj+8KF8d99ETFbNXeRECRpiq8pmrAI6XhHuirYwy9w7LThe YX8c/oyIXGoWGSiCA56z =CgXo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
