Christian, SSDs will warm up muuuch faster. Your other questionable require more info / discussion.
Otis Solr & ElasticSearch Support http://sematext.com/ On Mar 14, 2013 8:47 AM, "Christian von Wendt-Jensen" < christian.vonwendt-jen...@infopaq.com> wrote: > Does it only count if you are using SolrCloud? We are using a traditional > Master/Slave setup with Solr 4.1: > > 1 Master per 14 days: > Documents: ~15mio > Index size: ~150GB (stored fields) > > > #of masters: +30 > Performance: SUCKS big time until caches catches up. Unfortunately that > takes quite some time. > > Issues: > #1: Storage: To use SAN or not. > #2: Cores per instance: what is ideal? > #3: Size of cores: is 14 days optimal? > #4: Performance when searching across shards. > #5: Would SolrCloud be the solution for us? > > > > > > Med venlig hilsen / Best Regards > > Christian von Wendt-Jensen > IT Team Lead, Customer Solutions > > Infopaq International A/S > Kgs. Nytorv 22 > DK-1050 København K > > Phone +45 36 99 00 00 > Mobile +45 31 17 10 07 > Email christian.sonne.jen...@infopaq.com<mailto: > christian.sonne.jen...@infopaq.com> > Web www.infopaq.com<http://www.infopaq.com/> > > > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > This e-mail and accompanying documents contain privileged confidential > information. The information is intended only for the recipient(s) named. > Any unauthorised disclosure, copying, distribution, exploitation or the > taking of any action in reliance of the content of this e-mail is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error we would be obliged > if you would delete the e-mail and attachments and notify the dispatcher by > return e-mail or at +45 36 99 00 00 > P Please consider the environment before printing this mail note. > > From: Annette Newton <annette.new...@servicetick.com<mailto: > annette.new...@servicetick.com>> > Reply-To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org<mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>" > <solr-user@lucene.apache.org<mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>> > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:49:34 +0100 > To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org<mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>" < > solr-user@lucene.apache.org<mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>> > Subject: Re: Poll: Largest SolrCloud out there? > > 8 AWS hosts. > 35GB memory per host > 10Gb allocated to JVM > 13 aws compute units per instance > 4 Shards, 2 replicas > 25M docs in total > 22.4GB index per shard > High writes, low reads > > > > > On 13 March 2013 09:12, adm1n <evgeni.evg...@gmail.com<mailto: > evgeni.evg...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > 4 AWS hosts: > Memory: 30822868k total > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz x8 > 17M docs > 5 Gb index. > 8 master-slave shards (2 shards /host). > 57 msec/query avg. time. (~110K queries/24 hours). > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Poll-Largest-SolrCloud-out-there-tp4043293p4046915.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > -- > > Annette Newton > > Database Administrator > > ServiceTick Ltd > > > > T:+44(0)1603 618326 > > > > Seebohm House, 2-4 Queen Street, Norwich, England NR2 4SQ > > www.servicetick.com > > *www.sessioncam.com* > > -- > *This message is confidential and is intended to be read solely by the > addressee. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person or > copies taken unless authorised to do so. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender and permanently delete this message. As > Internet communications are not secure ServiceTick accepts neither legal > responsibility for the contents of this message nor responsibility for any > change made to this message after it was forwarded by the original author.* > >
