Yes... we were trying to avoid getting between solr and the user query, but that's a good suggestion on a relatively simple approach. To make it full correct, I fear, gets towards a full formal query parser, but we may be able to slide. For now, we can leave it as a known issue and just let the power searchers know.
Thanks for your help. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Unexpected-Results-tp4043107p4043418.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
