My feeling so far is that there are lots of Solr users with fairly simple and small scale setups where fully distributed SolrCloud system is not actually needed. I'm sure things are constantly shifting and in 12 months the same poll will yield more SolrCloud yes answers.
Otis -- Solr & ElasticSearch Support http://sematext.com/ On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>wrote: > I cannot answer "yes" to any of those options. > > Master/slave and cloud have different strengths and weaknesses. We will > use each one where it is appropriate. > > The loose coupling in master/slave is a very good thing and increases > robustness for a corpus that does not have tight freshness requirements. > > wunder > > On Feb 25, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Quick poll to see what % of Solr users use SolrCloud vs. Master-slave > setup: > > > > http://blog.sematext.com/2013/02/25/poll-solr-cloud-or-not/ > > > > I have to say I'm surprised with the results so far! > > > > Thanks, > > Otis > > -- > > Solr & ElasticSearch Support > > http://sematext.com/ > > > > > >
