Hi, I created a ticket and try to describe here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4471
Actually search speed, ram and memory usage on solr 4.x compared with 3.6. looks good, only the network is blocked by full copy index from slave. André On 16.02.13 03:25, "Mark Miller" <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: >For 4.2, I'll try and put in >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4078 soon. > >Not sure about the behavior your seeing - you might want to file a JIRA >issue. > >- Mark > >On Feb 15, 2013, at 8:17 PM, Gary Yngve <gary.yn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've been unable to get the collections create API to work with >> createNodeSet containing hostnames, both localhost and external >>hostnames. >> I've only been able to get it working when using explicit IP addresses. >> >> It looks like zk stores the IP addresses in the clusterstate.json and >> live_nodes. Is it possible that Solr Cloud is not doing any hostname >> resolving but just looking for an explicit match with createNodeSet? >>This >> is kind of annoying, in that I am working with EC2 instances and >>consider >> it pretty lame to need to use elastic IPs for internal use. I'm hacking >> around it now (looking up the eth0 inet addr on each machine), but I'm >>not >> happy about it. >> >> Has anyone else found a better solution? >> >> The reason I want to specify explicit nodes for collections is so I can >> have just one zk ensemble managing collections across different >> environments that will go up and down independently of each other. >> >> Thanks, >> Gary >
