On 2/11/2013 7:47 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Doesn't sound right to me. I'd guess you heard wrong.
I did a search for "id" with the quotes throughout the branch_4x source
code. After excluding test code, test files, and other things that
looked like they have good reason to be hardcoded, I was left with the
following:
This class looks like a definite problem.
org.apache.solr.common.cloud.HashBasedRouter
Object idObj = sdoc.getFieldValue("id"); // blech
This class uses "id" in a way that looks bad to me, but it's just for
logging:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer
I can't tell if use of "id" in these classes is problematic.
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.LukeRequestHandler
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.QueryElevationComponent
org.apache.solr.handler.component.RealTimeGetComponent
org.apache.solr.handler.loader.JsonLoader
org.apache.solr.handler.loader.XMLLoader
org.apache.solr.spelling.SpellCheckCollator
These classes use "id" in a way that does not look problematic to me,
but should be reviewed.
org.apache.solr.cloud.ElectionContext
org.apache.solr.cloud.Overseer
org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerCollectionProcessor
org.apache.solr.core.JmxMonitoredMap
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.ThreadDumpHandler
Thanks,
Shawn
