Thanks Yonik, I'm cooking up some static warming queries right now, based upon our commonly issued queries. I've already been noticing occasional long running queries. Our web farm times out a search after twenty seconds and issues an exception. I see a few of these every day and am trying to combat them with better warm up queries. My current static warm up queries are too simple I suspect. They don't replicate any of our typically issued filter queries nor function queries.
Thanks Robi -----Original Message----- From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:46 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: queryResultCache *very* low hit ratio One other thing that some auto-warming of the query result cache can achieve is loading FieldCache entries for sorting / function queries so real user queries don't experience increased latency. If you remove all auto-warming of the query result cache, you may want to add static warming entries for these fields. -Yonik http://lucidworks.com On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Petersen, Robert <rober...@buy.com> wrote: > Hi solr users, > > My queryResultCache hitratio has been trending down lately and is now at > 0.01%, and also it's warmup time was almost a minute. I have lowered the > autowarm count dramatically since there are no hits anyway. I also wanted to > lower my autowarm counts across the board because I am about to expand the > warmup queries in my newSearcher config section. Would I be better just > turning off this cache completely? I don't really want to increase its size > because I've found that by keeping my cache sizes limited keeps me from > getting OOM exceptions across my slave farm. > > Thanks, > > Robert (Robi) Petersen > Senior Software Engineer > Search Department >
