Yeah, I don't know what you are seeing offhand. You might try Solr 4.1 and see if it's something that has been resolved.
- Mark On Jan 23, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Marcin Rzewucki <mrzewu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Guys, I pasted you the full log (see pastebin url). Yes, it is Solr4.0. 2 > cores are in sync, but the 3rd one is not: > INFO: PeerSync Recovery was not successful - trying replication. core=ofac > INFO: Starting Replication Recovery. core=ofac > > It started replication and even says it is done successfully: > INFO: Replication Recovery was successful - registering as Active. core=ofac > > but index files were not downloaded. It's empty, no docs. Also I do not see > "replication.properties" file. "tlog" dir is empty and "index" dir contains > only 3 files: segments.gen, segments_7 and write.lock > It seems to be tough issue. Anyway, thanks for your help. > > > On 23 January 2013 15:41, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Looks like it shows 3 cores start - 2 with versions that decide they are >> up to date and one that replicates. The one that replicates doesn't have >> much logging showing that activity. >> >> Is this Solr 4.0? >> >> - Mark >> >> On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> Mark, >>> >>> Take a peek in the pastebin url Marcin mentioned earlier >>> (http://pastebin.com/qMC9kDvt) is there enough info there? >>> >>> Upayavira >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013, at 02:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote: >>>> Was your full logged stripped? You are right, we need more. Yes, the >> peer >>>> sync failed, but then you cut out all the important stuff about the >>>> replication attempt that happens after. >>>> >>>> - Mark >>>> >>>> On Jan 23, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Marcin Rzewucki <mrzewu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> Previously, I took the lines related to collection I tested. Maybe >> some interesting part was missing. I'm sending the full log this time. >>>>> It ends up with: >>>>> INFO: Finished recovery process. core=ofac >>>>> >>>>> The issue I described is related to collection called "ofac". I hope >> the log is meaningful now. >>>>> >>>>> It is trying to do the replication, but it seems to not know which >> files to download. >>>>> >>>>> Regards. >>>>> >>>>> On 23 January 2013 10:39, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: >>>>> the first stage is identifying whether it can sync with transaction >>>>> logs. It couldn't, because there's no index. So the logs you have shown >>>>> make complete sense. It then says 'trying replication', which is what I >>>>> would expect, and the bit you are saying has failed. So the interesting >>>>> bit is likely immediately after the snippet you showed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Upayavira >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013, at 07:40 AM, Marcin Rzewucki wrote: >>>>> >>>>> OK, so I did yet another test. I stopped solr, removed whole "data/" >>>>> dir and started Solr again. Directories were recreated fine, but >>>>> missing files were not downloaded from leader. Log is attached (I >>>>> took the lines related to my test with 2 lines of context. I hope it >>>>> helps.). I could find the following warning message: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jan 23, 2013 7:16:08 AM org.apache.solr.update.PeerSync sync >>>>> INFO: PeerSync: core=ofac url=http://<replica_host>:8983/solr START >>>>> replicas=[http://<leader_host>:8983/solr/ofac/] nUpdates=100 >>>>> Jan 23, 2013 7:16:08 AM org.apache.solr.update.PeerSync sync >>>>> WARNING: no frame of reference to tell of we've missed updates >>>>> Jan 23, 2013 7:16:08 AM org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryStrategy >>>>> doRecovery >>>>> INFO: PeerSync Recovery was not successful - trying replication. >>>>> core=ofac >>>>> >>>>> So it did not know which files to download ?? Could you help me to >>>>> solve this problem ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>> Regards. >>>>> >>>>> On 22 January 2013 23:06, Yonik Seeley <[1]yo...@lucidworks.com> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Marcin Rzewucki >>>>> <[2]mrzewu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, my mistake. I did 2 tests: in the 1st I removed just index >>>>> directory >>>>> >>>>>> and in 2nd test I removed both index and tlog directory. Log lines >>>>> I've >>>>> >>>>>> sent are related to the first case. So Solr could read tlog directory >>>>> in >>>>> >>>>>> that moment. >>>>> >>>>>> Anyway, do you have an idea why it did not download files from leader >>>>> ? >>>>> >>>>> For your 1st test, if you only deleted the index and not the >>>>> >>>>> transaction logs, Solr will look at the transaction logs to try and >>>>> >>>>> determine if it is up to date or not (by comparing with peers). >>>>> >>>>> If you want to clear out all the data, remove the entire data >>>>> directory. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Yonik >>>>> >>>>> [3]http://lucidworks.com >>>>> >>>>> References >>>>> >>>>> 1. mailto:yo...@lucidworks.com >>>>> 2. mailto:mrzewu...@gmail.com >>>>> 3. http://lucidworks.com/ >>>>> >>>> >> >>
