Hi,

I think trie type fields add value only if you do range queries in them and
it sounds like that is bit your use case.

Otis
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Jan 23, 2013 2:53 PM, "Isaac Hebsh" <isaac.he...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In my use case, Solr have to to return only the "id" field, as a response
> for queries. However, it should return 1000 docs at once (rows=1000).
>
> My id field is defined as StrField, due to external systems constraints.
>
> I guess that TrieFields are more efficient than StrFields. *Theoretically*,
> the field content can be retrieved without loading the stored field.
>
> Should I strive that the id will be managed as a number, or it has no
> contribution to performance (search & retrieve times)?
>
> (Yes, I know that lucene has an internal id mechanism. I think it is not
> relevant to my question...)
>
>
> - Isaac.
>

Reply via email to