Just remove the run-on "but" part from the URL:
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2011/10/solr-experience-search-parent-child.html

Common issue when URLs are auto-highlighted by browsers.

Regards,
   Alex.

Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working.  (Anonymous  - via GTD book)


On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:

> Dmitry,
>
> I have no idea why the link is broken I can suggest you to find "solr
> experience: search parent-child relations. part iii" post at the
> blog.griddynamic.com.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Dmitry Kan <solrexp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Mikhail,
> >
> > the griddynamics blog's link returns "Sorry, the page you were looking
> for
> > in this blog does not exist." Could you check if it is still available,
> > would be interesting to see the details!
> >
> > Dmitry
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
> > mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Dmitry,
> > >
> > > First of all, FacetComponent is the Solr's out-of-the-box
> functionality.
> > It
> > > runs after search is done and accesses the bitSet of the found
> document,
> > > i.e. there is no spans (matched terms positions) there at all.
> > >
> > > StandardFacetsAccumulator sounds like the "brand new" lucene faceting
> > > library. see http://shaierera.blogspot.com/. I don't think but don't
> > > exactly know whether they are accessible there too.
> > >
> > > Some time ago my team successfully prototyped facet component backed on
> > > spans
> > >
> >
> blog.griddynamics.com/2011/10/solr-experience-search-parent-child.htmlbut
> > > I don't suggest you go this way.
> > > I can suggest you start from the following:
> > > - supply PostFilter/DelegatingCollector
> > > http://yonik.com/posts/advanced-filter-caching-in-solr/
> > > - the DelegatingCollector will accept the scorer instance
> > > - if this scorer is BooleanScorer2 (but not BooleanScorer!), you can
> > access
> > > the SpanQueryScorer in one of the legs and try to access the matched
> > spans
> > > - if you are in 3.x you'll have a problem with disjunction queries.
> > >
> > > it seems challenging, doesn't it?
> > >
> > > 18.01.2013 17:40 пользователь "Dmitry Kan" <solrexp...@gmail.com>
> > написал:
> > >
> > > > Mikhail,
> > > >
> > > > Do you say, that it is not possible to access the matched terms
> > positions
> > > > in the FacetComponent? If that would be possible (somewhere in the
> > > > StandardFacetsAccumulator class, where docids are available), then by
> > > > knowing the matched term positions I can do some school simple math
> to
> > > > calculate the sentence counts per doc id.
> > > >
> > > > Dmitry
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
> > > > mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Dmitry,
> > > > >
> > > > > It definitely seems like postptocessing highlighter's output. The
> > also
> > > > > approach is:
> > > > > - limit number of occurrences of a word in a sentence to 1
> > > > > - play with facet by function patch
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1581 accomplished by
> tf()
> > > > > function.
> > > > >
> > > > > It doesn't seem like much help.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Dmitry Kan <solrexp...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > that we actually require the count of the sentences inside
> > > > > > each document where the hits were found.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sincerely yours
> > > > > Mikhail Khludnev
> > > > > Principal Engineer,
> > > > > Grid Dynamics
> > > > >
> > > > > <http://www.griddynamics.com>
> > > > >  <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev
> Principal Engineer,
> Grid Dynamics
>
> <http://www.griddynamics.com>
>  <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
>

Reply via email to