That is good to know, thanks! Taking the alternative (LUCENE-2754): somehow applying the most recent patch attached to the jira wasn't successful, not sure why. I'd guess, since it patches Lucene, one would still need to wire this to Solr or am I missing something?
Dmitry On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com>wrote: > Unfortuntaely, yes. > > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -----Original Message----- From: Dmitry Kan > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:42 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: SOLR 4.x: multiterm phrase inside proximity searches possible? > > > Thanks, Jack. > > I have been looking at SurroundQueryParser and came across an old thread > [1], mentioning two drawbacks: term analysis is left out and no default > search operator. > Do you know, if this is still true? > > [1] > http://search-lucene.com/m/**94ONm1KRuAv1/<http://search-lucene.com/m/94ONm1KRuAv1/> > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com>* > *wrote: > > There is no regular expression support across terms in queries, just >> within a single term, which is what LUCENE-2754 does >> (SpanMultiTermQueryWrapper). >> >> You can use the "surround" query parser to do span queries: >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/****SurroundQueryParser<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**SurroundQueryParser> >> <http://**wiki.apache.org/solr/**SurroundQueryParser<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SurroundQueryParser> >> > >> >> >> But, surround does not support regex terms, just wildcards. >> >> -- Jack Krupansky >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Dmitry Kan >> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 8:59 AM >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: SOLR 4.x: multiterm phrase inside proximity searches possible? >> >> >> Hello! >> >> Does SOLR 4.x support / is going to support the multi-term phrase search >> inside proximity searches? >> >> To illustrate, we would like the following to work: >> >> "\a b\" c"~10 >> >> which would return hits with "a b" 10 tokens away from c in no particular >> order. >> >> It looks like >> https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/LUCENE-2754<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/LUCENE-2754> >> <https:**//issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/LUCENE-2754<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2754> >> >implements >> >> what we need on the Lucene side. >> >> Regards, >> >> Dmitry >> >> >
