On 1/3/13 4:33 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
This has pretty much become the standard across other distributed systems and
in the literat…err…books.
Hmmm Im not sure you are right about that. Maybe more than one
distributed system calls them "Replica", but there is also a lot that
doesnt. But if you are right, thats at least a good valid argument to do
it this way, even though I generally prefer "good logical naming" over
"following bad naming from the industry" :-) Just because there is a lot
of crap out there, doesnt mean that we also want to make crap. Maybe
good logical naming could even be a small entry in the "Why Solr is
better than its competitors" list :-)
