On 1/3/13 2:50 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
Unfortunately, for 4.0, the collections API was pretty bare bones. You don't 
actually get back responses currently - you just pass off the create command to 
zk for the Overseer to pick up and execute.

So you actually have to check the logs of the Overseer to see what the problem 
may be. I'm working on making sure we address this for 4.1.

If you look at the admin UI, in the zk tree, you should be able to see what 
node is the overseer (look for its election node). The logs for that node 
should indicate the problem.

FYI, if I remember right, replication factor is not currently optional.
Actually I believe it is.

In the future, I'd like it so you can say like replicationFactor=max_int, and 
the overseer will periodically try to match that given the nodes it sees - but 
we don't have that yet.
Uhhhh, but why!

It would be nice if you can say replicationFactor=X where X is higher than your current number of nodes, and overseer then periodically tries to see if it can honor your original request for replicationFactor X (it will be when you eventually have X nodes in your cluster).

But specifying a MAX_INT value is IMHO a bad idea. It requires double "resource"-usage to maintain double number of replica, so you dont want more replica than necessary relative to your risk/HA-profile. I couldnt imaging a setup where you want replica of each shard across all nodes no matter how many nodes you add to your cluster. Of course you can always give a replicationFactor of 10 (or something high) and then if you know (currently believe) that you will never add more than 10 nodes to your cluster, then basically you will achieve what you wanted to do with MAX_INT. But if things evolve and you end up having 20 or 100 nodes in you cluster you probably do not want more than 10 replica anyway.

When you add new nodes, to add them to a current collection you will either 
have to use CoreAdmin API or pre configure the cores in solr.xml. All you need 
is to specify a matching collection name for the new core.

- Mark

Reply via email to