Hmmm... quite some time ago I switched from ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory to
MappingCharFilterFactory, because I was told (by who I can't recall) that
the latter was "better/preferred". Is there any particular reason to favor
one over the other?
So, if one is preferred over the other, the question becomes "Says who [what
Javadoc or code comment]?". And exactly what "preferred" benefit does one
get?
-- Jack Krupansky
-----Original Message-----
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 12:57 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Where is ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory (Solr4)?
ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory is preferred, does that suit your needs?
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Jack Krupansky
<j...@basetechnology.com>wrote:
Use its replacement, the MappingCharFilter char filter, like:
<fieldType name="text_char_norm" class="solr.TextField"
positionIncrementGap="100" >
<analyzer>
<charFilter class="solr.**MappingCharFilterFactory" mapping="mapping-**
ISOLatin1Accent.txt"/>
<tokenizer class="solr.**WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
</analyzer>
</fieldType>
-- Jack Krupansky
-----Original Message----- From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 9:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Where is ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory (Solr4)?
Hello,
I saw some example using ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory, but when I try to
use it myself, I get the class not found exception.
Is that something that no longer exists or am I just missing something
obvious.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/**alexandrerafalovitch<http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch>
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
