Again I am interested in hierarchical faceting as explained here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting
Again looking for anyone that has experience with PathHierarchyTokenizerFactory and Pivot Faceting to help me choose the 'best' solution. PathHierarchyTokenizerFactory seems to be easy to throw into one field in solr and have the client pull out info. Pivot Faceting seems more powerful, but the major drawback that I do not like is that you need to define a field for each depth in your hierarchy. I would like my depth to be more dynamic, i.e. if I need to store categories a few more levels deep I do not really want to add more fields (category_4, category_5, etc.....) and then reindex. Any thoughts or help that anyone can provide would be of great help. Thanks! On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Anirudha Jadhav <aniru...@nyu.edu> wrote: > Please see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters for more > details > > On Friday, December 21, 2012, hank williams wrote: > >> Great, thank you. >> >> > Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:42:13 +0100 >> > From: r....@solr.pl <javascript:;> >> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org <javascript:;> >> > Subject: Re: facet query >> > >> > Hello! >> > >> > Try facet.mincount=1, that should help. >> > >> > -- >> > Regards, >> > Rafał Kuć >> > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - >> ElasticSearch >> > >> > > Hi, is there a way with facets to say, return facets that are not >> > > 0? I have &facet=true&facet.field=office&facet.field=name as my >> > > facet parameters, and with some of my queries it brings back people >> that have a value of 0. >> > > Thanks >> > >> > > > > -- > Anirudha P. Jadhav
