The new UI interface does use them (at least some of them) and puts them into their own section. Unfortunately, the CSS reset does something funny to their styles (e.g. H1 looks like plain text). But they are used.
Regards, Alex. Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book) On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > Or stop including those files. They were an option in the old admin UI > that 'had' to be propogated through to the new one. But does anyone > actually use them? > > Upayavira > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012, at 07:19 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > > On 12/17/2012 11:55 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > > > Again, thinking from the beginner's view, is there any reason Solr > throws > > > scary looking exception traces in the console when it cannot find > optional > > > html files for admin interfaces (e.g. admin-extra.menu-top.html). > > > > > > From my days of tech support, I know that operators are often trained > that > > > ANY exception is not ok, so having several of them (and SEVERE at that) > > > could make people really confused and worried. And, if there were any > real > > > exceptions in there, they may get shadowed by these less important > ones. > > > > > > Would it make sense to catch those exceptions and log them as Info > messages > > > instead? > > > > I've already filed an issue for this. No activity so far. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3972 > > > > Thanks, > > Shawn > > >
