without going through such rigorous testing, maybe for my case (interested only in DAY), I could just index the trielong values such as 20121010, 20110101 etc...
This would take less space than trieDate (I guess), and I still have a date looking number (for easier handling). I could even base the days on 2000/01/01 and just index a single int (1..365, 366,...), but I don't think it's worth for now, I prefer to keep an easier to understand number. thanks -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/optimun-precisionStep-for-DAY-granularity-in-a-TrieDateField-tp4027078p4027193.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
