What is the benefit of having two slaves on the same machine? While it is possible to share indexes across nodes, it isn't recommended, as you'll need to know what you are doing, and will be deviating from the norm which will make your life (much) harder.
I really don't see how there's a benefit running a slave and its master on the same same hardware. Upayavira On Tue, Dec 11, 2012, at 01:10 PM, suri wrote: > Hi, > > We are planning to setup multiple slaves to handle search loads. Some of > these slaves will be on the same physical machine. Instead of each slave > doing the replication, > > 1. Can we share the index with multiple slaves? All salves are read-only. > 2. Can we have master and slave share the index? Master is write-only for > indexing and slave will be read-only for search requests. > > Sharing of indexes makes fewer nodes doing replication and also we will > be > saving some disk space because we will large index upto 1 TB. > > Is sharing of indexes by master/slave a valid set-up? > > Cheers, > Surya > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-sharing-between-multiple-slaves-tp4025996.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
