Ryan, my new best friend! Please, file JIRA issue(s) for these items!

I'm sure you will get some feedback.

- Mark

On Dec 6, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Ryan Zezeski <rzeze...@gmail.com> wrote:

> There are some gains to be made in Solr's distributed search code.  A few
> weeks about I spent time profiling dist search using dtrace/btrace and
> found some areas for improvement.  I planned on writing up some blog posts
> and providing patches but I'll list them off now in case others have input.
> 
> 1) Disable the http client stale check.  It is known to cause latency
> issues.  Doing this gave be a 4x increase in perf.
> 
> 2) Disable nagle, many tiny packets are not being sent (to my knowledge),
> so don't wait.
> 
> 3) Use a single TermEnum for all external id->lucene id lookups.  This
> seemed to reduce total bytes read according to dtrace.
> 
> 4) Building off #3, cache a certain number of external id->lucene id.
> Avoding the TermEnum altogether.
> 
> 5) If fl=id is present then dont' run the 2nd phase of the dist search.
> 
> I'm still very new to Solr so there could be issues with any of the patches
> I propose above that I'm not aware of.  Would love to hear input.
> 
> -Z
> 
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:35 PM, sausarkar <sausar...@ebay.com> wrote:
> 
>> We are using SolrCloud and trying to configure it for testing purposes, we
>> are seeing that the average query time is increasing if we have more than
>> one node in the SolrCloud cluster. We have a single shard 12 gigs
>> index.Example:1 node, average query time *~28 msec* , load 140
>> queries/second3 nodes, average query time *~110 msec*, load 420
>> queries/second distributed equally on three servers so essentially 140 qps
>> on each node.Is there any inter node communication going on for queries, is
>> there any setting on the Solrcloud for query tuning for a  cloud config
>> with
>> multiple nodes.Please help.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Query-performance-degrades-with-multiple-servers-tp4024660.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to