But slower indexing with solr 4.0 sounds suspicious to me... you compared your configs? JVM parameters? GC? IO? CPU?
Otis -- Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm On Nov 15, 2012 5:26 AM, "Nils Weinander" <nils.weinan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah, thanks Markus! > > That's a good thing. I tried disabling the transaction log, the difference > performance is marginal. So, I'll stick with the transaction logging. > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Markus Jelsma > <markus.jel...@openindex.io>wrote: > > > Hi - you're likely seeing a drop in performance because of durability > > which is enabled by default via a transaction log. When disabled 4.0 is > > iirc slightly faster than 3.x. > > > > > > -----Original message----- > > > From:Nils Weinander <nils.weinan...@gmail.com> > > > Sent: Thu 15-Nov-2012 10:35 > > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > Subject: Solr 4.0 indexing performance > > > > > > I have just updated from Solr 3.6 to 4.0, using defaults in > > solrconfig.xml > > > for both versions. With 4.0, bulk indexing takes about twice the time > it > > > did in 3.6. Is this to be expected, or the result of my lack of > > optimization > > > in the configuration? > > > > > > -- > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > > Nils Weinander > > > > > > > > > -- > ____________________________________________________________ > Nils Weinander >
