Hi, Sami.
Doing some tests I´ve used the same code as you and did a quick execution:
*HttpSolrServer server = new HttpSolrServer("
http://localhost:8080/solrserver/core1<http://localhost:10080/newscover_es/items_es>
");*
* *
* try {*
* *
* HashMap editTags = new HashMap();*
* editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});*
* doc.addField("myField", editTags);*
* server.add(doc);*
* server.commit(true, true);*
* *
* } catch (SolrServerException e) {*
* e.printStackTrace();*
* } catch (IOException e) {*
* e.printStackTrace();*
* }*
*
*
*
*
And the resultant doc is wrong:
<response>
<lst name="responseHeader">
<int name="status">0</int>
<int name="QTime">1</int>
<lst name="params">
<str name="q">*:*</str>
</lst>
</lst>
<result name="response" numFound="1" start="0">
<doc>
<str name="i_id">50a0f1f90cf226fb5677fe13</str>
<arr name="myField">
*<str>[Ljava.lang.String;@7d5e90cb</str> ---> toString() from String[]
array.*
</arr>
<long name="_version_">1418710023780958208</long>
</doc>
</result>
</response>
So is definetely executing toString() method in both *HttpSolrServer *and *
CloudServer*. Tips:
- I´m using* Solrj 4.0.0 *artifact version in a *Maven *project.
- The fields to be updated are *dynamicFields*.
- I´m using Java jdk6.
Alternatives:
- I´m doing something wrong and I´m so stupid that I can´t see it, :-(
- The way I update fields is not the correct one.
- There is a general bug with atomic updates via SolrJ.
Regards,
- Luis Cappa.
2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com>
> I´ll have a look to Solr source code and try to fix the bug. If I succeed
> I´ll update JIRA issue with it, :-)
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ssi...@gmail.com>
>
>> Actually it seems that xml/binary request writers only behave differently
>> when using array[] as the value. if I use ArrayList it also works with the
>> xml format (4.1 branch). Still it's annoying that the two request writers
>> behave differently so I guess it's worth adding the jira anyway.
>>
>> The Affects version should be 4.0.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Hello, Sami.
>> >
>> > It will be the first issue that I open so, should I create it under Solr
>> > 4.0 version or in Solr 4.1.0 one?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > - Luis Cappa.
>> >
>> > 2012/11/15 Sami Siren <ssi...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <
>> luisca...@gmail.com
>> > > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Thread update:
>> > > >
>> > > > When I use a simple:
>> > > >
>> > > > *Map operation = new HashMap();*
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Instead of:
>> > > >
>> > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
>> > > > List<String>>();*
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > The result looks better, but it´s still wrong:
>> > > >
>> > > > fieldName: [
>> > > > "[Value1, Value2]"
>> > > > ],
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > However, List<String> value is received as a simple String
>> "[Value1,
>> > > > Value2]". In other words, SolrJ is internally executing a toString()
>> > > > operation to the List<Sring>. Is impossible to update atomically a
>> > > > multivalued field with a List of values in just one atomic update
>> > > > operation?
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Seems to be working fine here with HttpSolrServer /
>> BinaryRequestWriter;
>> > >
>> > > HashMap editTags = new HashMap();
>> > > editTags.put("set", new String[]{"tag1","tag2","tag3"});
>> > > doc = new SolrInputDocument();
>> > > doc.addField("id", "unique");
>> > > doc.addField("tags_ss", editTags);
>> > > server.add(doc);
>> > > server.commit(true, true);
>> > > resp = server.query(q);
>> > >
>> > System.out.println(resp.getResults().get(0).getFirstValue("tags_ss"));
>> > >
>> > > prints "tag1"
>> > >
>> > > ArrayList<String> as a value works the same way as String[].
>> > >
>> > > When using xml (RequestWriter) I can see the problem that you are
>> > > describing, can you add a jira for that?
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Sami SIren
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > - Luis Cappa.
>> > > >
>> > > > 2012/11/15 Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com>
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hello everyone,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I´ve tested atomic updates via Ajax calls and now I´m starting
>> with
>> > > > atomic
>> > > > > updates via SolrJ... but the way I´m proceeding doesn´t seem to
>> work
>> > > > well.
>> > > > > Here is the snippet:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > *SolrInputDocument do = ne SolrInputDocument();*
>> > > > > *doc.addField("id", "myId");*
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *Map<String, List<String>> operation = new HashMap<String,
>> > > > > List<String>>();*
>> > > > > *operation.put("set", [[a list of String elements]]); // I want a
>> > set
>> > > > > operation to override field values.*
>> > > > > *doc.addField("fieldName", operation);*
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *cloudSolrServer.add(doc); // Atomic update operation.*
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > And after updating the resultant doc is as follows:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > *doc: {*
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *...*
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *fieldName: [ "{set=values}"*
>> > > > > *],*
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *...*
>> > > > >
>> > > > > *
>> > > > > *
>> > > > >
>> > > > > *}*
>> > > > >
>> > > > > In other words, the map which includes the "set" operation and the
>> > > field
>> > > > > values is String formatted and that String is used to update the
>> > field,
>> > > > :-/
>> > > > >
>> > > > > What is the correct way to update just one or more fields with
>> SolrJ?
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - Luis Cappa
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > >
>> > > > - Luis Cappa
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > - Luis Cappa
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> - Luis Cappa
>
>
--
- Luis Cappa
