Hi Mikhail,

thank you for your answer. Maybe my sample data was a not so god. The document 
always have additional data which I need to use as facet like this: 

<doc>
  <str name="id">3</str>
  <str name="attribute_A>value</str>
  <str name="attribute_B>value</str>
  <str name="options">
    <str>A</str>
    <str>B</str>
    ...
  <str>
  <str name="value">
    <str>200</str>
    <str>400</str>
    ...
  <str>
</doc>

Torben

Am 05.10.2012 um 17:20 schrieb Mikhail Khludnev:

> denormalize your docs to option x value tuples, identify them by duping id.
> 
> <doc>
>  <str name="setid">3</str>
>  <str name="options">A</str>
>  <str name="value">200</str>
> </doc>
> <doc>
>  <str name="setid">3</str>
>  <str name="options">B</str>
>  <str name="value">400</str>
> </doc>
> <doc>
>  <str name="setid">3</str>
>  <str name="options">B</str>
>  <str name="value">400</str>
> </doc>
> <doc>
>  <str name="setid">3</str>
>  <str name="options">C</str>
>  <str name="value">240</str>
> </doc>
> 
> then collapse them by set "setid" field. (it can not be uniqkey).
> 
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Torben Honigbaum <
> torben.honigb...@neuland-bfi.de> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Mikhail,
>> 
>> I read the article and can't see how to solve my problem with
>> FieldCollapsing.
>> 
>> Any other suggestions?
>> 
>> Torben
>> 
>> Am 04.10.2012 um 17:31 schrieb Mikhail Khludnev:
>> 
>>> it's a typical nested document problem. there are several approaches. Out
>>> of the box solution as far you need facets is
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing .
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Torben Honigbaum <
>>> torben.honigb...@neuland-bfi.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Jack,
>>>> 
>>>> thank you for your answer. The problem is, that I don't know the value
>> for
>>>> option A and that the values are numbers and I've to use the values as
>>>> facet. So I need something like this:
>>>> 
>>>> Docs:
>>>> 
>>>> <doc>
>>>> <str name="id">3</str>
>>>> <str name="options">
>>>>   <str>A</str>
>>>>   <str>B</str>
>>>>   ...
>>>> <str>
>>>> <str name="value">
>>>>   <str>200</str>
>>>>   <str>400</str>
>>>>   ...
>>>> <str>
>>>> </doc>
>>>> <doc>
>>>> <str name="id">4</str>
>>>> <str name="options">
>>>>   <str>A</str>
>>>>   <str>E</str>
>>>>   ...
>>>> <str>
>>>> <str name="value">
>>>>   <str>300</str>
>>>>   <str>400</str>
>>>>   ...
>>>> <str>
>>>> </doc>
>>>> <doc>
>>>> <str name="id">6</str>
>>>> <str name="options">
>>>>   <str>A</str>
>>>>   <str>C</str>
>>>>   ...
>>>> <str>
>>>> <str name="value">
>>>>   <str>200</str>
>>>>   <str>400</str>
>>>>   ...
>>>> <str>
>>>> </doc>
>>>> 
>>>> Query: …?q=options:A
>>>> 
>>>> Facet: 200 (2), 300 (1)
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you
>>>> Torben
>>>> 
>>>> Am 04.10.2012 um 17:10 schrieb Jack Krupansky:
>>>> 
>>>>> Use a field called "option_value_pairs" with values like "A 200" and
>>>> then query with a quoted phrase "A 200".
>>>>> 
>>>>> You could use a special character like equal sign instead of space:
>>>> "A=200" and then you don't have to quote it in the query.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Torben Honigbaum
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 11:03 AM
>>>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Problem with relating values in two multi value fields
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've a problem with relating values in two multi value fields. My
>>>> documents look like this:
>>>>> 
>>>>> <doc>
>>>>> <str name="id">3</str>
>>>>> <str name="options">
>>>>> <str>A</str>
>>>>> <str>B</str>
>>>>> <str>C</str>
>>>>> <str>D</str>
>>>>> <str>
>>>>> <str name="value">
>>>>> <str>200</str>
>>>>> <str>400</str>
>>>>> <str>240</str>
>>>>> <str>310</str>
>>>>> <str>
>>>>> </doc>
>>>>> 
>>>>> My problem is that I've to search for a set of documents and display
>>>> only the value for option A, for example, and use the value field as
>> facet
>>>> field. I need a result like this:
>>>>> 
>>>>> <doc>
>>>>> <str name="id">3</str>
>>>>> <str name="options">A</str>
>>>>> <str name="value">200</str>
>>>>> </doc>
>>>>> <facet> …
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think that this is a use case which isn't possible, right? So can
>>>> someone show me an alternative way to solve this problem? The documents
>>>> each have 500 options with 500 related values.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you
>>>>> Torben
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Sincerely yours
>>> Mikhail Khludnev
>>> Tech Lead
>>> Grid Dynamics
>>> 
>>> <http://www.griddynamics.com>
>>> <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev
> Tech Lead
> Grid Dynamics
> 
> <http://www.griddynamics.com>
> <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>

Reply via email to