Thanks for your response Damien. As you said, you can do some basic things quiclier than solr-php-client. I think is a good choice for basic applications, and if needed more specific things, then go with solr-php-client also.
2012/10/2 Damien Camilleri <i...@webdistribution.com.au> > Hi esteban. Im currently using both in my application. Both are fine. > Solarium is great because it models the concepts of solr and can build > queries using OOP. The other one is more lower level, so u have to write > queries manually, which can be good in some situations. Both are fast > enough. Solarium has bigger learning curve. Solarium has built in batch > updating and other things like parallel queries. So i would go with > solarium. Its a very nice library. > On Oct 3, 2012 5:38 AM, "Esteban Cacavelos" <estebancacave...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, I'm starting a web application using solr as a search engine. The web > > site will be developed in PHP (maybe I'll use a framework also). > > > > I would like to know some thoughts and opinions about the clients ( > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolPHP). I didn't like very much the PHP > > extension option because I think this is a limitation. So, I would like > to > > read opinions about SOLARIUM and SOLR-PHP-CLIENT. > > > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > -- > > Esteban L. Cacavelos de Amoriza > > Cel: 0981 220 429 > > > -- Esteban L. Cacavelos de Amoriza Cel: 0981 220 429
