Rohit,
Which collector do you use? Releasing physical ram is possible with
compacting collectors like serial, parallel and maybe g1 and not possible
with cms. The more important thing that releasing is really suspicious and
even odd requrement. Please provide more details about your jvm and overall
challenge.
03.09.2012 15:03 пользователь "Rohit" <ro...@simplify360.com> написал:
>
> I am currently using StandardDirectoryFactory, would switching directory
factory have any impact on the indexes?
>
> Regards,
> Rohit
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claudio Ranieri [mailto:claudio.rani...@estadao.com]
> Sent: 03 September 2012 10:03
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RES: Solr Not releasing memory
>
> Are you using MMapDirectoryFactory?
> I had swap problem in linux to a big index when I used
MMapDirectoryFactory.
> You can to try use solr.NIOFSDirectoryFactory.
>
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Lance Norskog [mailto:goks...@gmail.com] Enviada em: domingo, 2 de
setembro de 2012 22:00
> Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Assunto: Re: Solr Not releasing memory
>
> 1) I believe Java 1.7 release memory back to the OS.
> 2) All of the Javas I've used on Windows do this.
>
> Is the physical memory use a problem? Does it push out all other programs?
>
> Or is it just that the Java process appears larger? This explains the
latter:
> http://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mmapdirectory-on-64bit.html
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Rohit" <ro...@simplify360.com>
> | To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> | Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2012 1:22:14 AM
> | Subject: Solr Not releasing memory
> |
> | Hi,
> |
> |
> |
> | We are running solr3.5 using tomcal 6.26 on a Windows Enterprise RC2
> | server, our index size if pretty large.
> |
> |
> |
> | We have noticed that once tomcat starts using/reserving ram it never
> | releases them, even when there is not a single user on the system. I
> | have tried forced garbage collection, but that doesn't seem to help
> | either.
> |
> |
> |
> | Regards,
> |
> | Rohit
> |
> |
> |
> |
>
>
