Hi, I saw some old posts on the Solr vs. ES topic, but they were about performance/benchmarks only, and even those were not done correctly.
We have a couple of posts on that topic pending over on Sematext Blog. We can publish them next week, so keep an eye on http://blog.sematext.com/ and/or http://twitter.com/sematext . Otis ---- Performance Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase - http://sematext.com/spm >________________________________ > From: Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 12:22 PM >Subject: Are there any comparisons of Elastic Search specifically with SOLR 4? > >Hello, > >Has anybody compared feature set of SOLR 4 with Elastic Search? I saw >some earlier comparisons and they talked about sharding and >distributed service, etc. Seems to me, most of those are addressed in >version 4. > >The only big issue I see is a better support from ES for nested items >and/or parent linking, which I guess on lucene level is done with some >sort of dynamic-style fields? Not sure what's SOLR's answer for that >(JOIN seems to be a little different). > >I don't need that information for myself (I like SOLR well enough), >but I was asked to compare and am trying to actually understand the >difference. And, for our use-case, I think we can consider JSON vs. >QueryString and dynamic schema changes to be less important. I am >looking at non-reproducible difference between those two solutions >(given that they are both built on Lucene (4?) ). > >Regards, > Alex. >Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/ >LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch >- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all >at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD >book) > > >
