Hi Arslan, Thank you for your answer, finally it was only my bad between copyfield and copyField. Now all good. I don't know how copyField and edismax working exactly, but can I do both? Currently I copyed all fields in "all" <defaultSearchField>all</defaultSearchField>. So can I use edismax as well in the solrconfig.xml side?
Thank you! -----Message d'origine----- De : Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com] Envoyé : lundi 13 août 2012 13:44 À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org Objet : RE: multi-searching problem > <field name="all" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" > multiValued="true"/> > <copyfield source="article_id" > dest="all"/> > <copyfield source="article_nom" > dest="all"/> > </fields> > > <uniqueKey>article_id</uniqueKey> > <defaultSearchField>all</defaultSearchField> It is always good idea to edit example schema.xml according to your needs. See copyField declarations. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/example/solr/collection1/conf/schema.xml It is not copyfield but copyField. Case-sensitive stuff. And copyField declarations are defined under the <uniqueKey>article_id</uniqueKey> definition in example schema.xml. By the way using edismax is more flexible than catch all field. Think green - keep it on the screen. This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
