In other computations I found exactly zero performance difference between floats & doubles. Even with long arrays number which you would expect to be sensitive to locality effects.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) <dsmi...@mitre.org> wrote: > Yeah it is... I rather like this write-up: > https://sites.google.com/site/trescopter/Home/concepts/required-precision-for-gps-calculations#TOC-Precision-of-Float-and-Double > -- which also arrives at 2.37m worse case. > > Aside from RAM savings, I wonder if there is any noticeable performance > difference for LatLonType. > > > > ----- > Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Tuning-caching-of-geofilt-queries-tp3998975p4000534.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
