If think you could use a field without the term frequencies for searching, that will solve your relevancy issues. You can then have the exact same content in an other field (using a copyField directive in your schema), having terms frequencies and positions turned on, and use this particuliar for highlighting. Searching and highlighting can be totally separated from my understanding. You could even use an alternate query using the hl.q parameter so that you can highlight terms that were not searched for, or have terms searched but not highlighted.
Hope this helps, -- Tanguy 2012/8/2 abhayd <ajdabhol...@hotmail.com> > So we have some content where document title is like this > > "Accessory for iphone, iphone4, iphone 4s" > > So these one come on top results for iphone. This could be content > authoring > issue. But we are looking into avoiding such content to come on top. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/termFrequncy-off-and-still-use-fastvector-highlighter-tp3998590p3998820.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
