Hi, Interesting article in your link. What servlet container do you use and how is it configured wrt. threads etc? You should be able to utilize all CPUs with a single Solr index, given that you are not I/O bound.. Also, what is your mergeFactor?
-- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com On 9. juli 2012, at 22:11, avenka wrote: > Hmm, never mind my question about replicating using symlinks. Given that > replication on a single machine improves throughput, I should be able to get > a similar improvement by simply sharding on a single machine. As also > observed at > > http://carsabi.com/car-news/2012/03/23/optimizing-solr-7x-your-search-speed/ > > I am now benchmarking my workload to compare replication vs. sharding > performance on a single machine. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-replication-question-tp3993761p3994017.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
