Thank you! On 4 July 2012 17:37, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com> wrote: > What exactly is it that is too slow?
I was comparing Queries with "debugQuery" enabled and disabled. The difference was 60 seconds to 30 seconds for some (unusual) large Queries (many Terms over a large set of documents chosen by filter queries). After the caches are warm, the performance is of course far better. > It would be nice to have an optional search component or query parser option > that returned the analyzed term for each query term. Yes, I was thinking of reusing the analysis.jsp for that task, but couldn't see an easy way to handle phrase queries and wasn't sure if it performs better than the debugQuery approach. > But as things stand, I would suggest that you do your own "fuzzy match" > between the debugQuery terms and your source terms. That may not be 100% > accurate, but probably would cover most/many cases. Thanks, that's reassuring :) Cheers, Michael
