Actually, post.jar does not use SolrJ at all, thus it is simple and light with no dependencies. It simply uses HttpURLConnection :) Also have a look at SOLR-599 which has an interesting light-weight SolrJ server also without the extra deps.
-- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com On 21. juni 2012, at 00:23, Erik Hatcher wrote: > I think it's a bit of an "it depends" on whether post.jar is the Right choice > for production. > > It -is- SolrJ inside after all, Erick :) and it's pretty much the same as > using curl. Just be sure you control commits as needed. > > Erik > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 15:18, Bruno Mannina <bmann...@free.fr> wrote: > >> Hi Erick, >> >>> I doubt you'll find any significant difference in indexing speed. But the >>> post.jar file is really intended as a demo program to quickly get the >>> examples working. It was never intended to be a production-ready >>> program. I'd think about using something like SolrJ etc. to index the docs. >> >> ah?! I don't know yet SolrJ :( >> I need to know how to program in java? >> >> I transformed all my xml source files to the xml structure below and I'm >> using post.jar >> I thought it was (post.jar) a standard tool to index docs. >> >>> And I'm assuming your documents are in the approved Solr format, somthing >>> like >>> <add> >>> <doc> >>> <field name="myfield">value for field</field> >>> . >>> . >>> </doc> >>> <doc> >>> . >>> . >>> . >>> </doc> >>> </add> >> Yes all my xml docs have this format. >> >>> solr will not index arbitrary XML. If you're trying to do this, you'll >>> need to transform >>> your arbitrary XML into the above format, consider SolrJ or something >>> like that in >>> this case. >> >> If all my xml docs are in the xml structure above, is it necessary to use >> SolrJ ? >> >>
