I don't have the answer to your question, but I certainly don't think anybody should be slapped in the face for asking a question!
Michael Della Bitta ------------------------------------------------ Appinions, Inc. -- Where Influence Isn’t a Game. http://www.appinions.com On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:50 AM, santamaria2 <aravinda....@contify.com> wrote: > Say I have various categories of 'tags'. I want a keyword search to search > through my index of articles. So I search over: > 1) the title. > 2) the body > 3) about 10 of these tag-categories. Each tag category is multivalued with a > few words per value. > > Without considering the affect on 'relevance', and using the standard lucene > query parser, would it be faster to specify each of these 10 fields in q (q > = cat1:keyword OR cat2:keyword OR ... ), or to copyfield the stuff in those > 10 fields into one combined field? > > Or is it such that I should be slapped in the face for even thinking about > performance in this scenario? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-faster-to-search-over-many-different-fields-or-one-field-that-combines-the-values-of-all-those-tp3987766.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
