You do get relevancy related "leakage" though. With users content all in the
same index and using the same field names, term and document frequencies across
the index will be used for scoring. This may be (and has been) a good reason
to keep separately searchable content in different indexes/cores.
Erik
On May 29, 2012, at 15:07 , Mike Douglass wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> That sounds good - are we sure to get no leakage with this approach?
>
> I'd be indexing personal information which must not be delivered without
> authentication.
>
> The solr instance is front-ended by bedework which can handle the auth and
> adding a query term.
>
>> IMO it would be a better (from Solr's perspective) to handle the security
>> w/ the application code. Each query could include a "?fq=userID:12345..."
>> which would limit results to only what that user is allowed to see.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Many-Cores-with-Solr-tp3161889p3986675.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
