You're on the right track. In the default schemas it's kind of tricky. You see the bit of the "location" definition as: subFieldSuffix="_coordinate"
And later, you see: <dynamicField name="*_coordinate" type="tdouble" indexed="true" stored="false"/> So the latlng_0/latlng_1 _coordinate fields are created by this dynamic field mapping. You can either leave the dynamic field stuff there, or I suppose create your own. I'd use the "tdouble" though, presumably the folks who created the example did it for a reason.... Best Erick On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Spadez <james_will...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Right, for Long/Lat I found this information: > > <-----Long / Lat Field Type-----> > > <fieldType name="location" class="solr.LatLonType" > subFieldSuffix="_coordinate"/> > > <-----Fields-----> > > <field name="latlng" type="location" indexed="true" stored="true" /> > <field name="latlng_0_coordinate" type="double" indexed="true" stored="true" > /> > <field name="latlng_1_coordinate" type="double" indexed="true" stored="true" > /> > > Does this look more logical? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Newbie-tries-to-make-a-Schema-xml-tp3974200p3976539.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
