So it's easy to reproduce? What do you mean restored from a prior state? What snapshot are you on these days for future ref?
You have double checked to make sure that shard is listed as ACTIVE right? On May 11, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote: > I've had a few instances where a machine has needed to be restored > from a prior state. After doing so and firing up solr again I've had > instances where replication doesn't seem to be working properly. I > have not seen any failures in logs (will have to keep a closer eye on > this) but when this happens and I execute a query against each with > distrib=false I am seeing the following counts > > Shard @ host1(shard1) returned 95150 > Shard @ host2(shard1) returned 95150 > Shard @ host2(shard4) returned 94311 > Shard @ host3(shard4) returned 8468 > Shard @ host3(shard5) returned 8303 > Shard @ host1(shard5) returned 96054 > Shard @ host1(shard2) returned 95620 > Shard @ host2(shard2) returned 95620 > Shard @ host2(shard3) returned 93195 > Shard @ host3(shard3) returned 8336 > Shard @ host3(shard6) returned 8309 > Shard @ host1(shard6) returned 96036 > > > in this case host3 is what failed and as you can see everything on > host3 is significantly less than what the leader has. Has anyone else > experienced this? - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com
