That's the standard way, it's actually pretty efficient. Why is this a concern? Just the verbosity of the getRestults()?
Best Erick On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:58 AM, vybe3142 <vybe3...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can achieve this by building a query with start and rows = 0, and using > <queryResponse>.getResults().getNumFound(). > > Are there any more efficient approaches to this? > > Thanks > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLRJ-Is-there-a-way-to-obtain-a-quick-count-of-total-results-for-a-query-tp3955322.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
