Hi Erick, The schema browser says that no dynamic fields were indexed. Any idea how do I specify dynamic fields through XPath when I only know the prefix and nothing else?
Regards, Rakesh Varna On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Rakesh Varna <rakeshva...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Erick, > Thanks for the response. I am trying to index xml files in a directory. > I provide the xpath details, file location etc in data-config.xml. I will > try the 2 approaches that you have mentioned. > > Regards, > Rakesh Varna > > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hmmm, not sure about the dataconfig.xml file. What >> are you trying to index? Is this DIH? Because >> if you're simply posting Solr-formatted XML docs, >> dataconfig.xml is irrelevant.... >> >> You say you're not seeing the output. One of two >> things is going on: >> 1> The data is not in the index. See the admin/schema browser >> page to examine what actually went in your index. >> 2> Try doing the query with fl=*. You may simply not be asking >> for the fields to be returned. >> >> Best >> Erick >> >> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Rakesh Varna <rakeshva...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hello Solr-users, >> > I am trying to index xml files which have the following tags: (I am >> > using Solr 3.5 on Tomcat) >> > >> > <DOC> >> > <theta1>0.98</theta_1> >> > <theta2>0.767</theta_2> >> > ..... >> > .. >> > .. >> > .. >> > <thetaN>0.2873</thetaN> >> > </DOC> >> > >> > The numbers after "theta" are not a continuous sequence and I do not >> know >> > how many such tags are there. I thought this was a good candidate for >> > dynamic fields and have the following schema for those tags: >> > <dynamicField name="theta*" type="double" indexed="true" >> > stored="true"/> >> > Is this correct? If so, what should I use in the data-config.xml file to >> > index these tags? >> > >> > When I try the admin feature in the browser and query *:* , I don't see >> the >> > theta fields in the response. >> > >> > If not, is dynamicFields a wrong choice? Is there another way of >> indexing >> > these fields? >> > >> > Thanks in advance, >> > Rakesh Varna >> > >
