(Bit off-topic but...) I understand the fact that Solr isn't meant to 'store' everything, but because highlighting matches requires a field to be stored I would expect most people having to end-up storing full document content in their indexes? Can't think there is any good workaround for this...
Rav On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote: > Yes, you can. but.... Generally, storing the raw input in Solr is > not the best approach. The problem here is that pretty soon > you get a huge index that contains *everything*. Solr was not > intended to be a data store. > > Besides, you then need to store the binary form of the file. Solr > only deals with text, not markup. > > Most people index the text in Solr, and enough information > so the application knows where to go to fetch the original > document when the user drills down (e.g. file path, database > PK, etc). Would that work for your situation? > > Best > Erick > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 3:55 PM, <spr...@gmx.eu> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to index various filetypes in solr, this can easily done with > > ExtractingRequestHandler. But I also need the extracted content back. > > I know ext.extract.only but then nothing gets indexed, right? > > > > Can I index the document AND get the content back as with > ext.extract.only? > > In a single request? > > > > Thank you > > > > >
