Duh. quantiles. I was reading quantities. Old eyes.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote: > Quantiles require accessing the entire list of results, or at least, sorting > by the interesting values, checking the total hits, then accessing the > results list at the desired interval. So, with 3000 hits, get deciles by > getting the first row, then the 301st row, the 601st row, etc. > > This might be slow and require a lot of memory. Solr is optimized for showing > the top few results. Anything that accesses all results or even requests rows > far down the list can be very slow. > > If your main use requires accessing all results, Solr may not be the right > choice. A relational database is designed for efficient operations over the > entire set of results. > > wunder > > On Mar 29, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Kashif Khan wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am doing R&D about SOLR using any quantiles function for a set. I need a >> quick-start road-map for modifying that quantiles function in my SOLR >> plugin. I am thinking that it might be using any third party tools or >> library for it. >> >> -- >> Kashif Khan >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Quantiles-in-SOLR-tp3870084p3870084.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > >