Duh. quantiles. I was reading quantities. Old eyes.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote:
> Quantiles require accessing the entire list of results, or at least, sorting 
> by the interesting values, checking the total hits, then accessing the 
> results list at the desired interval. So, with 3000 hits, get deciles by 
> getting the first row, then the 301st row, the 601st row, etc.
>
> This might be slow and require a lot of memory. Solr is optimized for showing 
> the top few results. Anything that accesses all results or even requests rows 
> far down the list can be very slow.
>
> If your main use requires accessing all results, Solr may not be the right 
> choice. A relational database is designed for efficient operations over the 
> entire set of results.
>
> wunder
>
> On Mar 29, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Kashif Khan wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am doing R&D about SOLR using any quantiles function for a set. I need a
>> quick-start road-map for modifying  that quantiles function in my SOLR
>> plugin. I am thinking that it might be using any third party tools or
>> library for it.
>>
>> --
>> Kashif Khan
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Quantiles-in-SOLR-tp3870084p3870084.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to