Thanks Erick!! -----Original Message----- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 6:58 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Regarding Indexing Multiple Columns Best Practise
I would *guess* you won't notice much/any difference. Note that, if you use a fieldType with the increment gap > 1 (the default is often set to 100), phrase queries (slop) will perform differently depending upon which option you choose. Best Erick On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Husain, Yavar <yhus...@firstam.com> wrote: > Say I have around 30-40 fields (SQL Table Columns) indexed using Solr from > the database. I concatenate those fields into one field by using Solr > copyfield directive and than make it default search field which I search. > > If at the database level itself I perform concatenation of all those fields > into one field and then index that field directly (it will avoid copy > operation of Solr of each field to that concatenated field) will it be a > indexing performance improvement? I am sure it will be but will it make a > big/huge change in indexing running time? > > Thanks!!!! > ********************************************************************** > ******************** This message may contain confidential or > proprietary information intended only for the use of the > addressee(s) named above or may contain information that is legally > privileged. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person > responsible for delivering it to the intended addressee, you are > hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing or copying > this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by > mistake, please immediately notify us by replying to the message and delete > the original message and any copies immediately thereafter. > > Thank you.- > ********************************************************************** > ******************** > FAFLD >
