I've run some test on both the versions of Solr we are testing... one is the 2010.12.10 build and the other is the 2012.02.16 build. The latter one is where we were initially seeing poor response performance. I've attached 4 text files which have the results of a few runs against each of the builds with and without LazyFieldLoading enabled (plus some on the later build with wildcard fl parameters enabled).
>From what I see, the timings don't seem to be too telling (but not really knowing the ins and outs of it you may see something different). Where we see the hit/performance is on the response time getting the information back. Hopefully this helps some. http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n3780995/2010-12-10build_lazyfieldloading_false.txt 2010-12-10build_lazyfieldloading_false.txt http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n3780995/2010-12-10build_lazyfieldloading_true.txt 2010-12-10build_lazyfieldloading_true.txt http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n3780995/2012-02-16build_lazyfieldloading_false.txt 2012-02-16build_lazyfieldloading_false.txt http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n3780995/2012-02-16build_lazyfieldloading_true.txt 2012-02-16build_lazyfieldloading_true.txt -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Performance-Improvement-and-degradation-Help-tp3767015p3780995.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
