Your question can't be answered as asked, there are just too many variables. Your best bet is to test and see.
Best Erick On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Ranveer Kumar <ranveer.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > How much query per second a single core can handle in this case.. > > regards > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Sujatha Arun <suja.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Erick. >> >> Regards >> Sujatha >> >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> > You can have a large number of cores, so people have multiple >> > hundreds. Having multiple cores is preferred over having >> > multiple JVMs since it's more efficient at sharing system >> > resources. If you're running a 32 bit JVM, you are limited in >> > the amount of memory you can let the JVM use, so that's a >> > consideration, but otherwise use multiple cores in one JVM >> > and give that JVM say, half of the physical memory on the >> > machine and tune from there. >> > >> > Best >> > Erick >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sujatha Arun <suja.a...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > We have in production a number of individual solr Instnaces on a single >> > > JVM.As a result ,we see that the permgenSpace keeps increasing with >> each >> > > additional instance added. >> > > >> > > I would Like to know ,if we can have solr cores , instead of individual >> > > instances. >> > > >> > > >> > > - Is there any limit to the number of cores ,for a single instance? >> > > - Will this decrease the permgen space as the LIB is shared.? >> > > - Would there be any decrease in performance with number of cores >> > added? >> > > - Any thing else that I should know before moving into cores? >> > > >> > > >> > > Any help would be appreciated? >> > > >> > > Regards >> > > Sujatha >> > >>
