Why is this? And what happened to http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Re-Field-Collapsing-disable-cache-td481783.html ?
I don't see why basic caching of request -> result shouldn't be the same? I know I could put a layer on top, but I'd like to use a built in cache if possible. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Field-collapsing-results-caching-tp3570288p3598989.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
