That was a little confusing! " there's always exactly one token at position 0."
Of course. What I meant to say was there is always exactly one token in a non-tokenized field and it's offset is always exactly 0. There will never be tokens at position 1. So asking to match phrases, which is based on term positions is basically a no-op. Hope that makes more sense Erick On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > A side note: specifying qt and defType on the same query is probably > not what you > intend. I'd just omit the qt bit since you're essentially passing all > the info you intend > explicitly... > > I see the same behavior when I specify a non-tokenized field in 3.5 > > But I don't think this is a bug since it doesn't make sense to specify a > phrase > field on a non-tokenized field since there's always exactly one token > at position > 0. The whole idea of phrases is that multiple tokens must appear within > the slop. > > Best > Erick > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:46 PM, entdeveloper > <cameron.develo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm observing strange results with both the correct and incorrect behavior >> happening depending on which field I put in the 'pf' param. I wouldn't think >> this should be analyzer specific, but is it? >> >> If I try: >> http://localhost:8080/solr/collection1/select?qt=%2Fsearch&q=mickey%20mouse&debugQuery=on&defType=edismax&pf=blah_exact&qf=blah >> >> It looks correct: >> <str name="rawquerystring">mickey mouse</str> >> <str name="querystring">mickey mouse</str> >> <str name="parsedquery">+((DisjunctionMaxQuery((blah:mickey)) >> DisjunctionMaxQuery((blah:mouse)))~2) >> DisjunctionMaxQuery((blah_exact:"mickey mouse"))</str> >> <str name="parsedquery_toString">+(((blah:mickey) (blah:mouse))~2) >> (blah_exact:"mickey mouse")</str> >> >> However, If I put in the field I want, for some reason that phrase portion >> of the query just completely drops off: >> http://localhost:8080/solr/collection1/select?qt=%2Fsearch&q=mickey%20mouse&debugQuery=on&defType=edismax&pf=name_exact&qf=name >> >> Results: >> <str name="rawquerystring">mickey mouse</str> >> <str name="querystring">mickey mouse</str> >> <str name="parsedquery">+((DisjunctionMaxQuery((name:mickey)) >> DisjunctionMaxQuery((name:mouse)))~2) ()</str> >> <str name="parsedquery_toString">+(((name:mickey) (name:mouse))~2) ()</str> >> >> The name_exact field's analyzer uses KeywordTokenizer, but again, I think >> this query is being formed too early in the process for that to matter at >> this point >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/edismax-doesn-t-obey-pf-parameter-tp3589763p3590153.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
