I see there is a lot of discussions about "micro-sharding", I'll have to read them. I'm on an older version of solr and just use master index replicating out to a farm of slaves. It always seemed like sharding causes a lot of background traffic to me when I read about it, but I never tried it out. Thanks for the heads up on that topic... :)
-----Original Message----- From: Yury Kats [mailto:yuryk...@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:16 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Core overhead On 12/15/2011 4:46 PM, Robert Petersen wrote: > Sure that is possible, but doesn't that defeat the purpose of sharding? > Why distribute across one machine? Just keep all in one index in that > case is my thought there... To be able to scale w/o re-indexing. Also often referred to as "micro-sharding".
