Hi Dimitry, I pointed to the wiki page to enable JMX, then you can use any
tool that visualizes JMX stuff like Zabbix. See
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2011/10/02/monitoring-apache-solr-and-lucidworks-with-zabbix/
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Dmitry Kan <dmitry....@gmail.com> wrote:
> The culprit seems to be the merger (frontend) SOLR. Talking to one shard
> directly takes substantially less time (1-2 sec).
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Dmitry Kan <dmitry....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Tomás: thanks. The page you gave didn't mention cache specifically, is
> > there more documentation on this specifically? I have used solrmeter
> tool,
> > it draws the cache diagrams, is there a similar tool, but which would use
> > jmx directly and present the cache usage in runtime?
> >
> > pravesh:
> > I have increased the size of filterCache, but the search hasn't become
> any
> > faster, taking almost 9 sec on avg :(
> >
> > name: search
> > class: org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler
> > version: $Revision: 1052938 $
> > description: Search using components:
> >
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent,org.apache.solr.handler.component.FacetComponent,org.apache.solr.handler.component.MoreLikeThisComponent,org.apache.solr.handler.component.HighlightComponent,org.apache.solr.handler.component.StatsComponent,org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponent,
> >
> > stats: handlerStart : 1323255147351
> > requests : 100
> > errors : 3
> > timeouts : 0
> > totalTime : 885438
> > avgTimePerRequest : 8854.38
> > avgRequestsPerSecond : 0.008789442
> >
> > the stats (copying fieldValueCache as well here, to show term
> statistics):
> >
> > name: fieldValueCache
> > class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache
> > version: 1.0
> > description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=10000, initialSize=10,
> > minSize=9000, acceptableSize=9500, cleanupThread=false)
> > stats: lookups : 79
> > hits : 77
> > hitratio : 0.97
> > inserts : 1
> > evictions : 0
> > size : 1
> > warmupTime : 0
> > cumulative_lookups : 79
> > cumulative_hits : 77
> > cumulative_hitratio : 0.97
> > cumulative_inserts : 1
> > cumulative_evictions : 0
> > item_shingleContent_trigram :
> >
> {field=shingleContent_trigram,memSize=326924381,tindexSize=4765394,time=215426,phase1=213868,nTerms=14827061,bigTerms=35,termInstances=114359167,uses=78}
> > name: filterCache
> > class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache
> > version: 1.0
> > description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=153600, initialSize=4096,
> > minSize=138240, acceptableSize=145920, cleanupThread=false)
> > stats: lookups : 1082854
> > hits : 940370
> > hitratio : 0.86
> > inserts : 142486
> > evictions : 0
> > size : 142486
> > warmupTime : 0
> > cumulative_lookups : 1082854
> > cumulative_hits : 940370
> > cumulative_hitratio : 0.86
> > cumulative_inserts : 142486
> > cumulative_evictions : 0
> >
> >
> > index size: 3,25 GB
> >
> > Does anyone have some pointers to where to look at and optimize for query
> > time?
> >
> >
> > 2011/12/7 Tomás Fernández Löbbe <tomasflo...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Hi Dimitry, cache information is exposed via JMX, so you should be able
> to
> >> monitor that information with any JMX tool. See
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJmx
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Dmitry Kan <dmitry....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Yes, we do require that much.
> >> > Ok, thanks, I will try increasing the maxsize.
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:56 AM, pravesh <suyalprav...@yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > >>facet.limit=500000
> >> > > your facet.limit seems too high. Do you actually require this much?
> >> > >
> >> > > Since there a lot of evictions from filtercache, so, increase the
> >> maxsize
> >> > > value to your acceptable limit.
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards
> >> > > Pravesh
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > View this message in context:
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/cache-monitoring-tools-tp3566645p3566811.html
> >> > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> > Dmitry Kan
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dmitry Kan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dmitry Kan
>
