Hi,

> add features corresponding to stuff that we used to use in ElasticSearch

Does that mean you have used ElasticSearch but decided to try SolrCloud instead?

I'm also looking at a distributed solution. ElasticSearch just seems much 
further along than SolrCloud. So I'd be interested to hear about any particular 
reasons you decided to pick SolrCloud instead of ElasticSearch.

Andy



________________________________
 From: Per Steffensen <st...@designware.dk>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org 
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 6:23 AM
Subject: Continuous update on progress of "New SolrCloud Design" work
 
Hi

My guess is that the work for acheiving 
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/NewSolrCloudDesign has begun on branch "solrcloud". 
It is hard to follow what is going on and how to use what has been acheived - 
you cannot follow the examples on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud anymore 
(e.g. there is no shard="shard1" in solr/example/solr/solr.xml anymore). Will 
it be possible to maintain a how-to-use section on 
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/NewSolrCloudDesign with examples, e.g. like to ones 
on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud, on how to use it, that "at any time" 
reflects how to use whats on the HEAD of "solrcloud" branch?

In my project we are about to start using something else that ElasticSearch, 
and SolrCloud is an option, but there is a lot to be done in Solr(Cloud) before 
it is even comparable with ElasticSearch wrt features. If we choose to go for 
SolrCloud we would like to participate in the development of the new SolrCloud, 
and add features corresponding to stuff that we used to use in ElasticSearch, 
but it is very hard to contribute to SolrCloud if it is "black box" (that only 
a few persons know about) work going on on branch "solrcloud" getting us from 
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud to 
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/NewSolrCloudDesign.

Regards, Per Steffensen

Reply via email to