Thanks, Marijn. I have logged the bug here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2863
Is there any chance of a workaround for this issue before the bug is fixed? If you want to answer the question on StackOverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7905756/solr-3-4-group-truncate-does-not-work-with-facet-queries I'll accept your answer. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Martijn v Groningen < martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ian, > > I think this is a bug. After looking into the code the facet.query > feature doesn't take into account the group.truncate option. > This needs to be fixed. You can open a new issue in Jira if you want to. > > Martijn > > On 28 October 2011 12:09, Ian Grainger <i...@isfluent.com> wrote: > > Hi, I'm using Grouping with group.truncate=true, The following simple > facet > > query: > > > > facet.query=Monitor_id:[380000 TO 400000] > > > > Doesn't give the same number as the nGroups result (with > > grouping.ngroups=true) for the equivalent filter query: > > > > fq=Monitor_id:[380000 TO 400000] > > > > I thought they should be the same - from the Wiki page: 'group.truncate: > If > > true, facet counts are based on the most relevant document of each group > > matching the query.' > > > > What am I doing wrong? > > > > If I turn off group.truncate then the counts are the same, as I'd expect > - > > but unfortunately I'm only interested in the grouped results. > > > > - I have also asked this question on StackOverflow, here: > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7905756/solr-3-4-group-truncate-does-not-work-with-facet-queries > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Ian > > > > i...@isfluent.com <a...@endissolutions.com> > > +44 (0)1223 257903 > > > > > > -- > Met vriendelijke groet, > > Martijn van Groningen > -- Ian i...@isfluent.com <a...@endissolutions.com> +44 (0)1223 257903
