I don't think it'll work as I've tried this approach myself and the blocking issue was that Solr 1.4.1 use a different javabin version than Solr 3.4 (I think it's 1 vs 2) so the master and the slave(s) can't communicate using standard replication handler and thus can't exchange information and data about the index. My 2 cents. Tommaso
2011/10/26 Jaeger, Jay - DOT <jay.jae...@dot.wi.gov> > I very much doubt that would work: different versions of Lucene involved, > and Solr replication does just a streamed file copy, nothing fancy. > > JRJ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nemani, Raj [mailto:raj.nem...@turner.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 12:55 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Upgratding the Index from 1.4.1 to 3.4 using replication > > All, > > > > We are planning to upgrade our Solr instance from 1.4.1 to 3.4. We > understand that we need to re-index all the documents given the changes > to the index structure. If we setup a replication pipe with 1.4.1 as > the Master and 3.4 as the salve (with an empty index) is there would the > replication process convert the index from 1.4.1 format to 3.4 format? > > > > Thanks so much in advance for your time and help. > > Raj > > > >
